Podcast

Ep 135 – Telco has a context problem (John Abraham)

This week’s guest

John Abraham

Partner and Principal Analyst Appledore Research

Every telco exec is talking about AI agents. Almost nobody is talking about what those agents actually need to work: context.

Not just data — the logic, rules, and decision-making processes that define how your business actually operates. That knowledge currently lives in two places: buried in vendor code nobody fully understands, and inside people’s heads. No agentic system, no matter how shiny, can make decisions without it.

In this episode, I sit down with John Abraham, Partner and Principal Analyst at Appledore Research, to dig into why a lack of context is the real blocker for AI at scale, why most approaches only solve half the problem, and how an ontology gives AI the business logic it needs to not just analyze, but decide and act.

Listen now to hear:

  • The three Cs holding telcos back from using AI at scale [04:42];
  • Why AI agents risk creating a new generation of silos [08:59];
  • How a small use case can unlock compounding AI value [14:13]; and
  • Why a data lake is a costly side quest [15:09].

Links and resources

Wanna talk AI and public cloud? Telco execs, set up a meeting with our team to learn how to tap the immense business value it can bring.


Guest bio

With over 16 years of experience in the telecom industry, John leads Appledore’s Digital Enablement & Monetization program. Previously, he was at Analysys Mason for 11 years, where he led the digital experience research segment as principal analyst. He has experience working with a varied client base on topics ranging from digitization benchmarking and procurement for CSPs; strategy and go-to market for vendors; and commercial and technical due diligence for financial institutions. Earlier, as a consultant at a BSS vendor, he led requirements gathering, solution definition, and implementation at multiple Tier-1 telcos in Asia and Europe. John holds a bachelor’s degree in computer science from Anna University (India) and an MBA from Bradford University School of Management (UK).


Follow DR

The Telco in 20 podcast is ranked in the top 5% of all podcasts globally by Listen Notes! 🎉 We’ve also won 2024 and 2025 MarCom Awards, 2024 and 2025 Hermes Creative Awards, and are recognized as a TeckNexus Top 12 Telco and Tech Podcast, Forrester Top 100 Channel Podcast and Feedspot Top 10 Telecom Podcast.

If you enjoy the podcast, would you leave us a review? It takes you seconds to do in your app and it really makes a difference in helping to convince hard-to-get guests. And I love reading your feedback and reviews!

Podcast credits

  • Executive Producer and Host: Danielle Rios, TelcoDR
  • Senior Producer: Lindsay Grubb, TillCo Media
  • Senior Editor/Brand Manager: Alisa Jenkins, Springboard Marketing
  • Audio Editor: Andrew Condell
  • Supervising Producer: Amanda Avery
  • Associate Producer: Kriselda Dionisio
  • Music: Dyami Wilson

Most popular podcasts

  1. Ep 108 – ☕ Wake up and smell the BSS with Ray Le Maistre from TelecomTV ☕
  2. Ep 107 – 🧣Wrapping your head around Responsible AI🧣 (Ferry Grijpink)
  3. Ep 105 – NVIDIA’s vision for AI and the RAN (Chris Penrose)
  4. Ep 100 – The SPECIAL 100th episode of Telco in 20

Follow now

Get my FREE newsletter, delivered every two weeks, with curated content to help telco execs across the globe move to the public cloud.

Wanna talk public cloud?

Set up a meeting with our team to learn how to tap the immense business value it can bring.

More episodes from Telco in 20

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What are the three biggest challenges holding telcos back from AI at scale?

According to John Abraham, partner and principal analyst at Appledore Research, the three Cs are cost, context, and communication. Cost involves both the price of AI and uncertainty around its value. Context means agents often operate partially blind, lacking the business logic needed to make decisions. Communication refers to the challenge of enabling AI agents to coordinate and understand each other’s intent. Without solving these, telcos risk creating a new generation of agentic silos.

2. Why aren’t data lakes and APIs enough to give AI agents the context they need?

Data lakes and APIs can move data, but they can’t capture how a business actually makes decisions. As John Abraham explains, the missing piece is the business logic layer—the rules and processes currently buried in vendor code or inside people’s heads. Without that knowledge graph and decisioning layer, AI agents are flying blind. Context isn’t just about data access; it’s about encoding what your business is and isn’t allowed to do. Learn more in the Appledore Research and Totogi white paper titled Telecom-specific Ontology, the key to AI-native telco

3. What is a telco ontology, and why does it matter for AI?

An ontology has three components: a semantic layer (the “nouns” of your business—how things are defined and related), a kinetic layer (the “verbs” — how things interact and behave), and a dynamic layer (how decisions are made and actions are taken). Together, these give AI agents the full business context they need to act—not just access data. A data lake provides only the first layer; a full ontology enables AI to actually think and execute.

4. Why does Danielle Rios call the context layer a telco’s competitive moat?

DR argues that AI models are commodities—everyone gets access to the same LLMs. What differentiates a telco is its context layer: the codified business rules, relationships, and decisioning logic unique to that operator. That knowledge compounds over time and is owned by the telco, not locked in a vendor’s system. DR believes it’s also why vendors like Amdocs keep that logic away from you. The Totogi Ontology is built specifically to give that ownership back to operators, making it the real investment layer that allows AI to scale.

5. Do telcos need to finish their data lake before building an ontology?

No—and DR is direct about this. A data lake is, in her words, “a $20 million, multi-year side quest.” Even with clean data, you still need a way to act on it in live systems. The Totogi approach is to apply semantic consistency to systems of action now, start small with a focused use case, and build from there. A Tier-1 operator in the Middle East started with a dormant cell problem worth ~$1–2M and expanded to CXO-level fuel deployment decisions worth tens of millions—all on the same compounding ontology foundation. Learn more about this use case in the Telco in 20 episode: What’s up with Totogi: The biggest AI use case for telco.

6. How did Totogi demonstrate real AI value with a Tier-1 operator?

Totogi started with a narrow problem: identifying dormant cells causing roughly $1–2 million in revenue loss for a Middle East Tier-1 operator. The AI identified the issue, the Totogi Ontology defined what actions were valid, and the system executed. No tickets, no human intervention. As more systems connected to the ontology, value compounded. The same foundation now supports CXO-level decisions on fuel deployment across the network, worth tens of millions of dollars. Every decision made the ontology smarter for the next one.